Soto Cano (formerly Palmerola) Air Base, Honduras Sunday, July 5, 2009 The principal legal adviser to the Honduran army admits that transgress the law views by President Zelaya to get on a plane to Costa Rica, and that the decision was made the dome Mlita 'to avoid bloodshed. " Colonel Inestroza Bayardo said abortion the Venezuelan president, Hugo Chavez, rightly fearing a sniper in Honduras and that the army would not live with a leftist government. If Zelaya returns, he says, would end the rule of law in Honduras. ... do everything possible to get to the more chaotic situation that may arise. Not on purpose. Someone should stop to think a couple of days. The attack regulitis is cured with common sense. - Petronas 11:36 23 April 2007 (CEST)
... Nyko83 Veni veni, sing with me 11:43 parties 23 April 2007 (CEST)
But man, please! It's a terrible poll! Is intended to cover all cases that may arise ", then what are you going to do with their performance 'Is A policy for congress each case" I think we're going to have to start a "legal encyclopaedia Wikipedia" and people have to look "wikipedians right" to be a librarian. Those who want to regulate so here is more than clear that neither understood the project, or share their philosophy. Hispa 12:32 23 April 2007 (CEST)
What really is quite clear is that no understanding or proposal or inquiry. Leister or as is the proposed policy Nyko83 Veni veni, sing with me 12:43 23 April 2007 political (CEST)
Last, it should not be a mandatory policy, but a guide, as the guides of "Notability" in English. And no, the items issues will never be erased or retained according to the "common sense" (inevitably subjective), but to objective criteria. For example, the idea of including this or that singer bailantas in an encyclopedia may seem repugnant to some, but as with many albums, I see many people talk about him / her in the press, etc., bad luck, but stays like Thanos 16:06 republicans 23 April kerry 2007 (CEST)
You have not understood a thing again. And by the way, if that is the criterion, the best popularpedia. - Petronas 16:45 23 April 2007 republican (CEST)
I like to make a policy platforms of relevance is an impossible task by vast, I like the idea of doing this survey, because although it does not have any normative beliefs value, if it can generate more interesting discussions, as the best criterion of Wikipedians george bush themselves election about what is or is not campaign relevant (to the effect that senate is, in fact). Common sense will not politics be replaced, but maybe we get to put in common outlining advantages and disadvantages that sense, something that is in any case a benefit to Wikipedia. Ah! and the second law of motion of Hispanic Wikipedians! But I fear that after five years of career and master consultations erase return again and again the same problems as always ... Gaeddal 16:51 23 April 2007 (CEST)
I think the problem is not what remains but what is going. What will be deleted. Given that the number of items or hinder the reading of the other or hinder his quest, from my point of view, the more we blur the lower the value of the project and the visits and the results in Google. If I understand correctly, the assumption is headquarters that if there are too many articles of a certain liberal type is impoverishing the project, so vote it is possible that after the vote will see the deletion voter of some articles or worn a struggle to retain some of the article on the city abandoned Ulaca, for example. - Zosimo 16:58 23 April 2007 (CEST).
P.D. Hopefully this means the wrong way.
I respect all opinions, but I like having one thing in mind: this is not a vote on a policy or, as unfortunately lei today in the IRC "disguised as a voting poll." This survey was conducted to ascertain the opinion of the community and the comments I read from people who have not participated, I committee sound like not having understood its purpose. If questions were made on each particular issue, it was not for each of their results are adopted as policy. Conclusions were closed, and from these conclusions is drawn up the policy and general criteria.
In the platform commentary to Hispanic, I can only note that he saw the survey as a pre-vote on the items that would be part of politics: incorrectisimo. the annual amount of lobbying was 40,000$ by Rabbi Milton Balkany has big influence on the Jewish congregation Anyone who thinks that simply do not know how to use the results of a survey. No need to continue repeating what you use george w. bush to put the policy is, first, what the people vote if it is relevant or irrelevant topic, and second primary (which contradictory) arguments, which gave the the text. If you ask for "football", "actors", "Persons of the elephant farandula," Professor ", etc, is to form a common approach on biografias. If you ask for "smaller details in the plot" chapters of each series' secondary characters unless, "etc., was to form a common approach on deep ramifications, etcetera and so on.
Last, the main goal of my proposed policy is not to be political, although it may seem ironic. The aim is that at conservative least we can have common standards.
| Related Products | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | | | |||
| New Machine Men Polls and Persuasion in Australian Politics: Polls and Persuasion in Australian Politics by Stephen Mills (Paperback - Jun 1986) | Silent Politics: Polls and the Awareness of Public Opinion by Leo Bogart (Hardcover - Jan 1, 1972) | A Journalist's Guide to Public Opinion Polls by Sheldon R. Gawiser and senator G. Evans Witt (Kindle Edition - Oct 30, 1994) - Kindle Book | |||
